SPORT VS. SPORT: SURPRISING COMPARISONS THAT CHANGE THE GAME
- Opulent Sports
- Nov 19, 2025
- 2 min read
When it comes to fitness and fun, different sports engage our bodies in completely different ways. Yet, most of us don’t stop to ask: Which sport actually pushes us more?
Let’s explore some curious comparisons.
-Box Cricket vs. Traditional Cricket
Traditional cricket is strategic, slower, and often played over long stretches of time. On average, players in a traditional format burn between 200–250 calories per hour. Box cricket, however, is faster, shorter, and demands quick bursts of energy. A player can burn 400–450 calories per hour in a high-paced box cricket game. Twice the calorie burn in just half the time!
-Pickleball vs. Tennis
Pickleball, one of the fastest-growing sports in the world, is often described as tennis’ lighter cousin. While tennis players cover larger courts with explosive sprints, pickleball offers a lower-impact workout.
A casual game of pickleball can burn around 350 calories per hour, whereas tennis can push that up to 500–600 calories per hour depending on intensity. For those with knee or joint concerns, pickleball’s smaller court and lighter paddles make it the more joint-friendly option.

-Football vs. Futsal
Football is all about endurance, covering large grounds, and sustained energy levels, burning about 600–700 calories per hour. Futsal, played on a smaller surface with fewer players, focuses more on agility, footwork, and frequent touches with the ball. A futsal game still burns 450–500 calories per hour, but the key difference is intensity-every second counts, making it an ideal urban fitness sport.

These comparisons highlight one thing:
No sport is better than the other, it depends on what your body needs. Whether you want endurance, agility, or joint-friendly play, there’s a perfect match waiting for you.
At Opulent Sports, we create arenas where these games come alive. From box cricket pitches to pickleball courts, our goal is simple:
“more play, fewer excuses.”



